|
Some Ashe County land owners say theyre afraid a developer
left them high and dry when he failed to meet the conditions
of a planning variance approved years before they purchased
their lots at the peak of Phoenix Mountain.
County Planning Director Zach Edwardson raised the issue at
the planning boards regularly scheduled meeting at the
Ashe County Courthouse, July 5.
Variances are unique allowances in the countys planning
rules that require approval from the planning board. The variance
in question was recommended around 2001 by then
planner John Witherspoon and approved by the planning board
in place at the time, according to Edwardson. It allowed developer
Eric Hunter to gain final approval for a 16-acre, ridge-top
plan on Big Phoenix mountain.
But Edwardson told the current board on July 5, at its regular
meeting, that hed recently been contacted by a Phoenix
Mountain landowner who complained that Hunter had never met
the variances requirements.
Jack Drummond, the only Big Phoenix owner so far to complete
a home at the 30-lot development, told Edwardson his insurance
company had informed him it would not be renewing the policy
on his $1.9 million home at the end of his current term.
The reason given by the insurance company, Edwardson said, was
that a fire suppression system required by the variance, was
not in working order driving the fire risk was too high.
Edwardson said the variance allowed Hunter to develop the land
on 4,600-foot Big Phoenix despite a steep, narrow, twisting
approach road that fell short of county standards for fire vehicle
access.
The trucks can get up the road, Edwardson said.
The issue is whether they can get up the road full of
water, and in a timely fashion.
Because of that, as a condition of the variance, the planning
board agreed to allow Hunters development to move forward
on the condition that he build a self-contained fire suppression
system complete with a 10,000-gallon water tank, proper
plumbing, and fire hydrants near the home sites on top
of the mountain.
But evidence before the board last week seemed to suggest that
the developer had built his fire system right up to the point
of making it operational.
Hunter apparently went so far as to sink a 10,000-gallon water
tank into his own land to supply the fire hydrants hed
had erected around the development, though Edwardson said he
could not confirm the location or even the existence of the
tank.
Hed even buried the pipes to connect the tank with the
hydrants pipes, nonetheless, that were two times too
small to meet the 4-inch-diameter legal standard.
Edwardson, again, said he could not confirm the reports.
I did go up there with a representative
of the Jefferson Fire Department and confirmed that there was
no water in the hydrants, Edwardson said.
Colon McLean, president of the Phoenix Mountain
Homeowners Association (PMHA), said hed bought his parcel
in 2003, but was completely unaware that the fire hydrants hed
taken for granted actually were dry.
PMHA board member Murray Nixon agreed. Nixon said shed
listened to her real estate agents spiel on the developments
self-contained fire-fighting infrastructure and let it go at
that. Even when, out of curiosity, shed opened a valve
expecting the water to gush forth, Nixon let it pass when no
water appeared.
Without saying why, McLean said Hunter had threatened to cut
off the water. But, since no one had actually reported seeing
the water in the first place, it was unclear whether there had
ever been any water to disrupt.
It remains a mystery exactly who did discover the broken system.
Edwardson told the planning board the issue first came to his
attention when he received the complaint from Drummond, along
with an explanation of why his insurance was about to be canceled.
Edwardson said he dug the variance out of the files, read it
over and confirmed with the chief of the Jefferson Fire Department
that the hydrants were in fact dry.
The complaints filing, Edwardson advised, would require
the board to address Drummonds claims, in accordance with
state law.
That might mean the board would have to hold a hearing, and
might very likely be forced to revoke the Phoenix Mountain variance.
Without a variance Hunter was unlikely to be damaged since hes
already sold every lot in the development. On the other hand,
McLean and Nixon, and the remaining PMHA members, could expect
to watch their propertys value go from prime to worthless.
Without insurance, no bank would finance a loan. And, without
financing, there isnt much chance for a sale.
Edwardson advised the board it would have to restrict future
action to a single matter: whether or not the fire suppression
variance had been violated.
The only option we have, legally, is to revoke the variance,
Edwardson said, adding that, doing so would leave the homeowners
no recourse.
He said the homeowners were free to pursue civil action against
Hunter but the county could not redress their damages.
A while later, though, pressed by Nixon and McLean on whether
the countys rules carried any teeth at all, planning board
chair Priscilla Cox ventured that Hunter may have violated state
public safety laws. If so, the county might have the power to
file an injunction and fine Hunter $100 for each day he fails
to comply.
Vice-chair Rick Surber suggested to his colleagues that they
authorize a letter inviting Hunter to explain the dry fire plugs.
The idea was adopted unanimously and Hunter was given to July
26 to reply. The issue will be taken up again at the Aug. 2
meeting.
Hunters Other Legal Problems
The threat of civil action may be looming, but Eric Hunter is
facing some serious charges in criminal court as well. He was
arrested in May and charged with two felony counts of assault
with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. Hes accused
in that case of firing a shotgun at two building contractors
near his property on top of Phoenix Mountain.
The contractors represented a man whod recently bought
a parcel in Hunters Phoenix Mountain development. There
has been no public speculation by law enforcement on what might
have provoked the alleged shooting.
Hunter was scheduled to appear July 12 in Ashe County District
Court on the assault charges.
Development Plans Move Foreward
In other business at the July 5 meeting, the board approved
a preliminary plat on phase III of the seven-lot, 12.88-acre
Laurel Mountain development, off Laurel Mountain Estates Drive.
A vote on preliminary plat approval for the Cedar Crossing Townhomes
development 45 townhomes on 11.7 acres off U.S. 221
was delayed until the July 26 meeting in expectation that some
remaining road construction and approvals from the County Health
Department might be completed by then.
And, the board voted unanimously to grant final plat approval
for 12 lots at the 16.278-acre Little Phoenix Subdivision, off
Wade Bare Road.
|